SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Gau) 565

R.B.MISRA
Brijesh Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Sipra Dey – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.B. Misra, J.

1. Heard Mr. A.K. Bhowmik, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Ghosh, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A. Ghosh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor and Ms. S. Choudhury, learned Counsel for the respondents.

2. This is an application filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Article227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the Criminal proceeding in Case No. C.R. 62 of 2007 under Sections166/323/506/448 of IPC and the order dated 2.4.2007 taking cognizance by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Tripura, Agartala in the said Criminal proceeding.

3. Ms. S. Choudhury, learned Counsel has appeared and submitted that though she has filed vakalatnama along with Mr. D. Guha, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1, however she is not willing to assist the court today. She has only been instructed by Mr. Guha to pray for adjournment of the case. However, the Court specifically asked Ms. S. Choudhury to assist the Court for and on behalf of the respondent No. 1 by virtue of her being a counsel for the respondent No. 1 but she declined to render assistance to the Court as such does no




































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top