SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Gau) 127

D.BISWAS, B.D.AGARWAL
Subrata Paul – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

P.G. Agarwal, J.

1. By filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging his detention under the National Security Act, 1980 (briefly 'NSA') by virtue of order dated 29.08.2006 issued by the District Magistrate, Kamrup (Metropolitan), Guwahati under Memo No. X/2006/NSA/48/CA (A) and also order dated 11.10.2006 issued by the Commissioner & Secretary to the Government of Assam, Home and Political Department under Memo. No. PLA. 459/06/279, confirming the detention for a period of 12 months (Annexures-A and E respectively).

2. We have heard Mr. P.C. Dey, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. D.C. Chakraborty, learned Central Govt. Standing Counsel representing respondent No. 1 and Ms. B. Goyal, learned state counsel representing respondents 2 to 6.

3. The detention order has been basically challenged on the ground of long delay in considering and rejecting the representation. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that delay and latches committed by the respondents in considering the representation has infringed fundamental rights of the detenu enshrined under articles 21 and 22(5) of the Constitution of India. To


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top