SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Gau) 212

UTPALENDU BIKAS SAHA, KETULHOU MERUNO
State of Manipur – Appellant
Versus
Khumanlambam Nilaroton Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Utpalendu Bikas Saha, J.

1. By this application Under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Rule 2(2) of Chapter V-A of the Rules of Gauhati High Court, the petitioner prays for condonation of delay of 554 days in preferring the appeal against the judgment and order dated 07.01.05 passed by the learned single Judge in W.P. (C) No. 761 of 2004 wherein and whereunder the learned single Judge directed the petitioner-appellant to promote the respondent-writ petitioner in the next higher scale of pay w.e.f. the date of his completion of 12 years regular service as Inspector (Sericulture). The respondent-writ petitioner, as against the prayer for condonation of delay, filed objection by way of affidavit.

2. Heard Mr. N. Ibotombi, learned Counsel for the petitioner appellant as well as Mr. Kh. Binoy Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-writ petitioner.

3. In support of the contention, as stated in the petition for condonation of delay, Mr. N. Ibotombi submits that the delay caused is bonafide and not intentional as the Government is a machinery impersonal and nobody is looking the interest of the Government properly though some of the employees/offic


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top