SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Gau) 372

J.CHELAMESWAR, HRISHIKESH ROY
Siddhartha Sarkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Jasti Chelameswar, J.

1. These three writ petitions, namely, WP (C) Nos. 2103 of 2007, 4340 of 2006 and 2084 of 2007, were directed to be heard together by a common order of this Court dated 7.5.07 as these writ petitions raise certain common questions of law regarding the validity of the Rules framed by the State of Assam in the context of prescribing eligibility criteria for participating in Common Entrance Examination conducted by the State for selection of candidates for admission into professional courses like medicine, engineering and dental sciences.

2. The undisputed facts are that the State of Assam conducts a Common Entrance Examination for the purposes of selecting students for pursuing the abovementioned courses. The conduct of such Common Entrance Examination insofar as it pertains to MBBS/BDS are concerned is governed by the Rules framed by the State of Assam called The Medical Colleges of Assam, Regional Dental College, Guwahati and Govt. Ayurvedic College, Guwahati Regulation of Admission of Undergraduate Students Rules, 2007. Insofar as the engineering courses are concerned, admittedly no separate set of Rules have been framed by the State of Assam. But the n
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top