SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Gau) 259

UTPALENDU BIKAS SAHA
Axis Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Anupam Acharjee – Respondent


ORDER

U.B. Saha, J.

1. Heard Mr. P. Chakraborty, learned Counsel for the respondent-petitioner Bank. Also heard Mr. S. Deb, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. R. K. Das, learned Counsel for the writ petitioner-respondents and Mr. N. Majumder, learned Counsel for the respondents No. 4 and 5 in the writ petition.

2. The instant application is filed by the respondent creditor Bank for granting them leave to sell out the secured assets of the writ petitioners already in their possession and also for vacating the interim order dated 4-12-2009 passed by this Court in Civil Application No. 392 of 2009 arising out of W.P. (C) No. 381 of 2009 whereby and whereunder this Court after hearing Mr. S. Deb, learned senior counsel for the writ petitioners came to a conclusion that an ad interim order was called for and accordingly, as an interim measure, it was ordered that the secured assets shall not be sold out without leave of this Court. This Court also granted liberty to the respondents to file application for modification/alteration of the said interim order and disposed of the said Misc. Application.

3. It is the admitted position that the aforesaid interim order was passed in absence of t









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top