SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Gau) 1046

UTPALENDU BIKAS SAHA
V. K. Mathew – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

U.B. Saha, J.

1. Heard Mr. Kh. Binoykumar, learned Counsel assisted by Miss Rosylyn, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. Kumar, learned Addl. CGSC for the respondents.

2. Pleaded cases of the parties, deserved to be considered at the outset, are as under. Writ petitioner, who is presently working as Administrative Officer in the office of the Deputy Inspector General of Police (Administration) in the Central Reserve Police Force, Group Centre at Langjing (Imphal) and also presently, permanently settled at Bangalore in the State of Karnataka, being aggrieved by the order of Signal dated 05.04.2006 (Annexure-A/6 to the writ petition) wherein and whereunder choice posting of petitioner was cancelled and he is transferred from the present place of posting i.e. office of the DIG, Imphal to Group Centre, Nagpur, Western Sector, filed this writ petition on the grounds that the said Signal is contrary to the provisions of guidelines issued by the Director General, CRPF through its standing order No. 05/2003 (Annexure-A/9 to the writ petition), particularly, Sub-clause (b) and (c) of Clause 6 of the said standing order. This Court by order dated 24.04.2006 issued Rule made r












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top