SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Gau) 797

R.B.MISRA
Rani Saha – Appellant
Versus
Dipak K. Saha – Respondent


ORDER

R.B. Misra, J.

1. Heard Mr. B. Das, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. R.R. Dutta, learned Counsel for Smt. Rani Saha, petitioner-revisionist. Also heard Mr. S. Kar Bhowmik, learned Counsel for Sri Dipak Kr. Saha, the respondent No. 1 and Mr. R.C. Debnath, learned P.P. In charge appearing for the respondent State.

2. This criminal revision petition has been preferred under Section 397(1) Cr. P.C. (and not under Section 401. Cr. P.C.) against the judgment dated 18-2-2006 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No. 58(4)/05 preferred against the judgment dated 27-9-2005 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Tripura, Agartala (hereinafter called as ACJM) in CR. No. 3344/2001 affirming the conviction but modifying the sentence to pay a sum of Rs.70,000/- (a sum of Rs.65,000/- to be paid to the complainant and rest amount of Rs.5000/- be deposited to the treasury) instead of sentencing the accused/ applicant/petitioner/revisionist by the learned ACJM to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/-, in default to suffer imprisonment for three months in reference to the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top