AMITAVA ROY
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Manoranjan Das – Respondent
Amitava Roy, J.
1. The judgment and order dated 10.04.01, passed by the learned Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation Act, Guwahati, in W.P.(C) case No. 54/2000, awarding a sum of Rs. 1,10,502/- with interest thereon, in favour of the Respondent-claimant, has been put to challenge by the insurer of the vehicle No. As-01-B-6999.
2. I have heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned Counsel for the Appellant and Mr. D.K. Saikia learned Counsel for the opposite party No. 1. The opposite party No. 2 did not enter appearance in spite of service of notice.
3. The facts in brief, leading to the filing of the instant appeal are that the opposite party No. 1, while engaged as a handyman in the bus No. AS-01-B-6999, being in the employment of the opposite party No. 2, sustained injuries as the vehicle was involved in an accident. This was on 26.10.99. As a result of the accident, he sustained injuries on the right thigh and right shoulder-joint for which he took treatment at the Guwahati Medical Hospital, Guwahati, incurring an expenditure of Rs. 50,000/-. The opposite party No. 2, his employer, having refused to extend any financial help, the claim was lodged with the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.