BROJENDRA PRASAD KATAKEY
Lalrimawia – Appellant
Versus
State of Mizoram – Respondent
B.P. Katakey, J.
1. By this writ petition the guardian of a disabled person has challenged the communication dated 31st May 2005 issued by the Assistant Director (Pension) Government of Mizoram, denying the family pension to the disabled son of the Government servant under the provision of Rule 54 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules 1972 (in short Pension Rules) on the ground that no declaration as required under Sub-rule 12 of Rule 54 of the said rule was made by the Government servant about the disablement of his son while he was in service.
2. The fact involved in the present writ petition in brief is that Shri Rothangvunga was a group-D employee under the Government of Mizoram who retired from service on 31.3.2004 after rendering almost 29 years of service leaving behind three children i.e. two sons and one daughter, who subsequently died on 4.2.2005. After the death of the father an application on behalf of one of his son namely Master Lalrimawia was filed by his legal guardian Miss Lalenzami, his elder sister claiming family pension under Rule 54 of the pension Rules claiming that though he crossed 25 years of age, he being a permanently disabled person is ent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.