IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
B. Sudershan Reddy and Brojendra Prasad Katakey, JJ.
Must. Mosira Bibi
Vs.
State of Assam and Ors.
Decided On : 28.09.2006
Panchayat Act - Time Schedule - Section 15(1)
Fact of the Case:
The appellant challenged a resolution expressing no confidence against her, citing violation of the time schedule in Section 15(1) of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994. The resolution was adopted in a special meeting of the Gaon Panchayat, and the appellant appealed the dismissal of her writ petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the time schedule in Section 15(1) is procedural and directory, not mandatory. It held that even if the time schedule is mandatory, the appellant waived the requirement by refusing to approve the proposal for the special meeting.
Issues: The main issue was whether the time schedule in Section 15(1) of the Act is mandatory or directory.
Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the time schedule in Section 15(1) is directory in nature, as it is procedural and does not provide for consequences for non-adherence. It also emphasized that the provision is in the interest of the President and Vice-President of the Gaon Panchayat and can be waived by them.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the dismissal of the writ petition by the Single Judge.
B.P. Katakey, J.
1. The appellant, who was the elected President of Jhagrarpar Gaon Panchayat under Gauripur Anchalik Panchayat, filed the writ petition being W.P.(C) No. 7278 of 2005 challenging the resolution dated 28.9.2005, adopted in the special meeting of the said Gaon Panchayat expressing no confidence on her, on the ground of violation of the provision contained in Sub-section 1 of Section15 of Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 ('the Act'), insofar as it relates to the time schedule given in the said provision of law for the purpose of holding the special meeting for consideration of no confidence motion brought against the President and Vice-President of a Gaon Panchayat. A notice of no confidence by eight out of ten members of the said Gaon Panchayat was given on 29.8.2005 expressing want of confidence on the appellant. The Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat on receipt of such notice placed the same before the appellant on 30.8.2005 seeking her approval to convene a special meeting for consideration of the said no confidence motion. However, the appellant refused to accord approval for holding such special meeting, for which the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat on 16.9.2005 forwarded the matter to the Anchalik Panchayat intimating the refusal of the appellant to approve the proposal for holding the special meeting and also for a direction to hold such special meeting for consideration of such no confidence motion. Accordingly, as per direction of the President of the Anchalik Panchayat, the special meeting was held on 28.9.2005, wherein the resolution expressing no confidence against the appellant was adopted as eight out of the ten members voted in favour of the resolution expressing want of confidence on the appellant. The Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat intimated the Deputy Commissioner on 29.9.2005 about adoption of such resolution. The learned Single Judge relying on the Division Bench judgment of this court in Mumtaz Rana Laskar and Ors. v. State of Assam and Ors. reported in 2006 (1) GLT 46 has dismissed the writ petition by holding that the procedure prescribed in Section 15(1) of the Act is only directory and not mandatory and, therefore, non-adhering the time schedule given in the said provision will not make the resolution, adopted in the special meeting of the Goan Panchayat, invalid in law. Hence, the present appeal.
2. We have heard Mr. A. B. Chowdhury, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and Mrs. Goyal, learned State counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondents as well as Mr. D.A. Kaiyum, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 7, Vice-President of the Gaon Panchayat.
3. Mr. Chowdhury, the learned senior counsel for the appellant referring to the provision of Sub-section 1 of Section 15 of the Act has submitted that under the said provision, in case the President of the Gaon Panchayat against whom notice of no confidence is given, refused to approve the proposal of the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat to hold the special meeting for consideration of such motion, the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat is required to refer the matter to the President of the Anchalik Panchayat within three days from the date of expiry of 15 days of notice, and the Anchalik Panchayat is to convene the meeting within seven days from the date of such information. It has further been submitted that in case such meeting within such seven days is not convened by the Anchalik Panchayat, the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat is required to inform the Deputy Commissioner/Sub-Divisional Officer (Civil) within three days after the expiry of the said stipulated seven days time and in that case it is the Deputy Commissioner/Sub-Divisional Officer (Civil) who has to convene the meeting within seven days from the date of receipt of such information and such meeting is required to be presided over by the Deputy Commissioner/Sub-Divisional Officer (Civil) or by Gazetted Officer deputed by him not below the rank of Class-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.