A.B. Pal, J.

1. The judgment dated 25.5.98 passed by die learned Addl. District Judge, West Tripura, Agartala in T.S. (RCR) 30 of 97 allowing the suit with direction to the Appellant-wife herein to go to the house of her husband, the Respondent herein, within a period of one month and to live in the matrimonial house as husband and wife is under challenge in this appeal.

2. The Respondent-husband herein who is a class-IV employee under the Government married the Appellant herein on 22.9.88. But the conjugal tie stumbled from discords during a span of four years. They have no issue. The Respondent-husband has 3 sisters to support by his meagre income. According to his version, the Appellant used to leave his house and stay with her parents on her whims without caring the conjugal obligation on her part. He was, thus, deprived of the care and happiness which as a spouse he could reasonably expect from her. On the contrary, her irrational behaviour generated bitterness only straining their conjugal relation. On 12.7.92, she left her matrimonial home finally for her parents house. When all attempts on his part to bring her back failed, the Respondent-husband issued notice to her