IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Iqbal Ahmed Ansari, J.
Iman Ali and Ors.
Vs.
State of Assam
Crl. Appeal No. 182 of 1999
Decided On: 09.05.2006
Assault - Criminal Law - IPC Section 304 Part-II, Section 323, Section 109 read with Section 323 - The judgment discusses the evidence and scrutiny of witnesses in a case involving an assault on Taleb Ali. The court found accused Iman Ali guilty under Section 304 Part-II IPC, while accused Omar Ali and Mosab Ali were acquitted. The court reduced Iman Ali's sentence to 4 years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1,000.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved an altercation between accused Iman Ali and Taleb Ali, resulting in an assault on Taleb Ali, leading to his death. Witnesses provided conflicting testimonies regarding the involvement of the accused in the assault.
Finding of the Court:
The court found accused Iman Ali guilty under Section 304 Part-II IPC, while acquitting accused Omar Ali and Mosab Ali due to insufficient evidence. The court reduced Iman Ali's sentence to 4 years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1,000.
Issues: The key issue was to determine the involvement of the accused in the assault on Taleb Ali, considering the conflicting testimonies of the witnesses.
Ratio Decidendi: The court carefully scrutinized the evidence of witnesses and found that only accused Iman Ali was involved in the assault, leading to the reduction of his sentence.
Final Decision: The court maintained the conviction of accused Iman Ali under Section 304 Part-II IPC, acquitted accused Omar Ali and Mosab Ali, and reduced Iman Ali's sentence to 4 years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1,000.
I.A. Ansari, J.
1. By the impugned judgment and order, dated 15.7.1999, passed, in Sessions Case No. 02/1999, by the learned Sessions Judge, Morigaon, while the accused-Appellant No. 1, namely, Iman Ali, stands convicted under Section 304 Part-II IPC, the accused-Appellant Nos. 2 and 3, namely, Omar Ali and Mosab Ali respectively, stand convicted under Section 323 IPC and the accused-Appellant No. 4, namely, Mustt. Milajan Begum, stands convicted under Section 109 read with Section 323 IPC. While the accused-Appellant No. 1, Iman Ali, has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 6 (six) years and pay fine of Rs. 2,000.00 and, in default, suffer rigorous imprisonment for a further period of one month, the accused-Appellant Nos. 2, 3 and 4, namely, Omar Ali, Mosab Ali and Mustt. Milajan Begum respectively, stand sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 6 (six) months.
2. The case against the accused-Appellants, as unveiled at the trial, may, in brief, be described thus: On 10.1.1998, at about 7 a.m., on noticing accused Iman Ali cutting earth from the path, which passes by the side of the boundary of Taleb Ali's homestead, when Taleb Ali objected to the cutting of the earth, Iman Ali assaulted Taleb Ali on his back with the reverse side of a spade. On being so assaulted, Taleb Ali fell down on the ground. After Taleb Ali, so fell down on the ground, accused Omar Ali and accused Mosab Ali too, on being instigated by accused Milajan Begum, kicked Taleb Ali and gave him fist blows. On seeing assault on Taleb Ali, when his relatives, who were present at the house of Taleb Ali, raised halla, the accused went away. Taleb Ali was brought to his house in injured condition and he was, then, taken to the Civil Hospital, Morigaon. As his condition deteriorated and he was being shifted to Gauhati Medical College & Hospital, Guwhati, for treatment, he succumbed to his injuries on the way. With regard to the occurrence, First Information Report was lodged by the mother of Taleb Ali, namely, Minaki Begum. Based on this First Information Report, Mikirbheta P.S. Case No. 06/1998 under Sections 302/34 IPC was registered against the accused-Appellants. During the course of investigation, police held inquest over the said dead body, drew a sketch-map of the alleged place of occurrence, seized a dao from the house of accused Iman Ali and, on completion of investigation, laid charge-sheet against the accused-Appellants under Sections 302/34 IPC.
3. To the charges framed, at the trial, under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC against the accused-Appellant Nos. 1, 2 and 3, namely Iman Ali, Omar Ali and Mosab Ali respectively, all of them pleaded not guilty. As against the accused-appellant No. 4, namely, Milajan Begum, charge was framed under Section 109 read with Section 302 IPC. To the charge, so framed, accused-Appellant No. 4 too pleaded not guilty.
4. In support of their case, prosecution examined altogether 8 (eight) witnesses. The accused were, then, examined under Section 313 Code of Criminal Procedure and in their examination aforementioned, the accused denied that they had committed the offences alleged to have been committed by them, the case of the defence being that of total denial. The accused Appellant No. 3, namely, Mosab Ali took the plea of alibi and adduced evidence in support of this plea. On, however, finding the accused evidence in support of this plea. On, however, finding the accused-Appellant No. 1, Iman Ali, guilty of the offence under Section 304 (Pt. II) IPC, the learned trial Court convicted him accordingly and passed the sentence as mentioned hereinabove. Similarly, on finding the accused-Appellant Nos. 2 and 3, namely, Omar Ali and Mosab Ali respectively guilty of the offence under Section 323 IPC and accused-Appellant No. 4, namely, Milajan Begum, guilty of the offence under Section 109 read with Section 302 IPC, the learned trial Court convicted them too accordingly and passed sentences against th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.