SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Gau) 431

I.A.ANSARI
Iman Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: P. Sarma, Adv.
For Respondents/Defendant: B.S. Sinha, Adv.

JUDGMENT

I.A. Ansari, J.

1. By the impugned judgment and order, dated 15.7.1999, passed, in Sessions Case No. 02/1999, by the learned Sessions Judge, Morigaon, while the accused-Appellant No. 1, namely, Iman Ali, stands convicted under Section 304 Part-II IPC, the accused-Appellant Nos. 2 and 3, namely, Omar Ali and Mosab Ali respectively, stand convicted under Section 323 IPC and the accused-Appellant No. 4, namely, Mustt. Milajan Begum, stands convicted under Section 109 read with Section 323 IPC. While the accused-Appellant No. 1, Iman Ali, has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 6 (six) years and pay fine of Rs. 2,000.00 and, in default, suffer rigorous imprisonment for a further period of one month, the accused-Appellant Nos. 2, 3 and 4, namely, Omar Ali, Mosab Ali and Mustt. Milajan Begum respectively, stand sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 6 (six) months.

2. The case against the accused-Appellants, as unveiled at the trial, may, in brief, be described thus: On 10.1.1998, at about 7 a.m., on noticing accused Iman Ali cutting earth from the path, which passes by the side of the boundary of Taleb Ali's homestead, when Taleb Ali objected to the cutting






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top