SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Gau) 361

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (KOHIMA BENCH)
Iqbal Ahmed Ansari and Maibam B.K. Singh, JJ.
State of Nagaland
Vs.
Lipok Ao and Ors.
Criminal Appeal No. 1(K) of 2003
Decided On: 17.05.2007

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: B.N. Sharma, Sr. Adv. and Apok Pongener, Adv.
For Respondents/Defendant: C.T. Jamir, E.Y. Renthungo and Makheto Sema, Advs.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of conducting a proper examination of the accused under Section 313(1)(b), Cr. P.C. and the potential impact of a perfunctory examination on the outcome of the case.

Headnote:

Acquittal - Criminal Procedure - Sections 302, 307, 326 read with Section 34, IPC - 313(1)(b), Cr. P.C.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved the acquittal of accused-respondents charged under Sections 302, 307, and 326 read with Section 34, IPC. The prosecution's case was that the accused-respondents, members of an escort party, fired at the occupants of a car without provocation, resulting in death and injuries.

Finding of the Court:

The trial court acquitted the accused-respondents, holding that they had acted in discharge of their official duty, in self-defense, and under grave and sudden provocation.

Issues: The main issue was whether the accused-respondents were justified in firing at the occupants of the car and whether their actions constituted self-defense or discharge of official duty.

Ratio Decidendi: The appellate court found that the trial court's acquittal was completely against the evidence on record. The examination of the accused under Section 313(1)(b), Cr. P.C. was found to be perfunctory, with no legally permissible examination conducted. As a result, the acquittal could not be maintained, and the case was remanded for proper examination of the accused-respondents under Section 313(1)(b), Cr. P.C.

Final Decision: The appeal was partly allowed, and the case was remanded for examination of the accused-respondents under Section 313(1)(b), Cr. P.C. by the Deputy Commissioner (Judicial), Dimapur.

JUDGMENT

I.A. Ansari, J.

1. Though the present appeal arises out of acquittal of persons, who had been charged under Sections 302, 307 and 326 read with Section 34, IPC, it, as would transpire, demonstrates trial Court's complete lack of knowledge of the procedure for trial of criminal cases, particularly, a trial by a Court of Session and also reveals ignorance of the fundamental concepts of criminal jurisprudence.

2. With the above prefatory remarks, we must also point out that this is an appeal against the judgment and order, dated 18-2-2002, passed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner (Judicial), Dimapur, in GR-Case No. 256/99, acquitting the accused-respondents of the charges framed against them under Sections 302, 307 and 326 read with Section 34, IPC.

3. The case of the prosecution, as unfolded at the trial, may, in brief, be described as follows:

(i) In the afternoon of 29-5-1999, Shri L. Imkong, the then Minister, Govt. of Nagaland, was escorted by the personnel of the Nagaland Police including the accused respondents, in four vehicles, from Kohima to his private residence at Diphupar, Dimapur. At around 5-30 p.m. when the escort vehicles reached near a petrol pump, located in an area called Six Mile, at Dimapur, on Dimapur-Kohima road, they came dangerously close to a Maruti Zen bearing registration No. NL-01-2552, which was coming from their opposite direction, i.e. from the direction of Dimapur and proceeding towards Kohima, and as the said Maruti Zen was about to collide against the escort vehicle, the occupants of the Maruti Zen shouted at the escort party. The escort vehicles and the said Maruti Zen did not stop, rather, the vehicles aforementioned kept proceeding towards their respective destinations. However, the occupants of the Maruti Zen, while proceeding towards Kohima from Dimapur, stopped, for a other hand, soon after dropping the Minister at his private residence at Diphupar, the accused-respondents, who were members of the escort party, took leave of the Minister on the pretext that the next day was a Sunday and that they would deposit their arms and ammunitions at the quarter-guard, which was situated at Khopanalla near Dimapur. Having been permitted to leave, the accused respondents, however, came, in the pilot vehicle of the escort party, namely, NL-01-2648, towards Kohima in search of the said Maruti Zen and its occupants.

(ii) Thus, instead of proceeding, as had been projected by them before the Minister, to deposit their arms and ammunitions at the quarter-guard at Khopanalla, the accused-respondents proceeded with their vehicle towards Chumukidema and on reaching Chumukidema, when they saw the said Maruti Zen parked by the side of the road, they stopped their vehicle in front of the Maruti Zen blocking its way. On finding the accused-respondents blocking their way, when Shri Michael, one of the occupants of the Maruti Zen, who was at the driving seat, started reversing their vehicle to turn around, three of the accused-respondents, namely, Constable Ato Yimchunger, Constable Akaho Sumi and Constable Mayang Ao fired as many as 19 rounds of bullets from their arms on the occupants of the Maruti Zen without any provocation from them and without any danger of imminent threat to their own lives or to the lives of others. As a result of such shooting, one of the victims, namely, Shri Adina, who was sitting on the front seat of the Maruti Zen, by the side of Shri Michael, died instantly inside the car, the two other victims, namely, Shri Michael and Shri Pangertemsu were seriously injured and, later on, Shri Michael also died at a hospital at Delhi, while undergoing treatment there and Shri Pangertemsu, who had sustained bullet injuries on his right shoulder, had to suffer amputation of his right hand.

(iii) In the circumstances depicted above, when the victims had been either seriously injured or killed, Michael, who was, as indicated hereinbefore, at the driving seat, managed to, somehow, take the Maruti Z











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top