I.A.ANSARI
Avtar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Andrew Yule and Company Ltd. – Respondent
I.A. Ansari, J.
1. By making this application under Section 482, Cr. P.C. the petitioner, who was complainant in Complaint Case No. 209/2004, has sought" for, inter alia, setting aside and quashing the judgment and order, dated 2-5-2005, passed, in Criminal Revision No. 6(l)/2005, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dibrugarh, has set aside the order, dated 3-8-2004, passed, in Complaint Case No. 209/2004, whereby the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dibrugarh, took cognizance of offences under Section 420/506/294/34, IPC and directed issuance of processes to the accused named therein.
2. The material facts, which have led to the making of the present application under Section 482, Cr. P.C. may be set out as follows:
(i) The petitioner herein lodged a complaint, which gave rise to the Complaint Case No. 209/2004 aforementioned, the complainant's case being, briefly stated, thus : The complainant is the proprietor of a business concern, which is run under the name and style of Assam Valley Builders, situated at Morioni Road, Rajabari, Dibrugarh. The accused No. 11, namely, Khowang Tea Estate, is a tea division of accused No. 1, namely, Andrew Yule & Company Ltd. wh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.