SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Gau) 39

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (AGARTALA BENCH)
A.B. Pal, J.
Subal Kumar Dey
Vs.
State of Tripura
Decided On: 11.01.2007

The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of freedom of expression and the need to carefully examine the contents before taking cognizance of unfounded allegations.

Headnote:

Freedom of Expression - Criminal Defamation - Indian Penal Code, Sections 153-A, 505(1)(b)(c) - The court found that the news item in question did not incite disharmony between two communities and did not constitute an offense under the mentioned sections. The court emphasized the importance of freedom of expression and the need to carefully examine the contents before taking cognizance of unfounded allegations.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, an Editor and Publisher of a newspaper, was charged under Sections 153-A, 505(1)(b)(c) of the Indian Penal Code for publishing a news item that was alleged to incite disharmony between tribal and Bengali communities.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the news item did not incite disharmony between communities and did not constitute an offense under the mentioned sections. It emphasized the importance of freedom of expression and the need to carefully examine the contents before taking cognizance of unfounded allegations.

Issues: The issues revolved around whether the news item incited disharmony between communities and constituted an offense under Sections 153-A, 505(1)(b)(c) of the Indian Penal Code.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that criminality for the offense does not attach to the things said or done but to the manner in which it is said or done. It also highlighted the need to prevent abuse of the process of the court and the importance of freedom of expression.

Final Decision: The criminal revision petition was found to have merit, and the impugned order was set aside and quashed. The accused-petitioner was discharged and set at liberty.

ORDER

A.B. Pal, J.

1. The petitioner-Subal Kumar Dey is the Editor and Publisher of the Bengali daily named "Syandam Patrika" printed, published and circulated from Agartala. One Yudhisthir Ray lodged a complaint on 8-5-1997 in Chebri Police Station under Khowai Sub-division against Mr. Dey that his newspaper published a news item on 25-2-1997 that some explosives had been recovered from the house of a person named Ganga Charan Debbarma who was the relative of the then Chief Minister, which was false and fabricated. According to the informant the said news item was published with a view to malign the democratically elected Chief Minister and to incite disharmony between the tribal and the Bengali communities. The written complaint was registered as Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 46 of 1997 under Ss. 501, 505(l)(b)(c), 153, 153-A and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. The investigation following the said FIR found prima facie evidence resulting to submission of a charge-sheet against Mr. Dey, the petitioner herein. On the prayer of the petitioner the case was transferred from the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Khowai to the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agartala. On 30-6-2000 Mr. Dey submitted a prayer for his discharge on the ground that the criminal proceeding against him was not maintainable in law as no personal injury was caused to the informant. The prayer for discharge was dealt with by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate in his order dated 7-8-2001, While rejecting the prayer the trial Court observed that the charge-sheet was filed against the accused-petitioner under Ss. 153-A, 505(l)(b)(c) of the Indian Penal Code in support of which sufficient materials exist on record. It was further observed that both the provisions being analogous the alleged offence had to be understood after ascertaining whether the news item was published and circulated to excite commotion and create communal disharmony and whether such news was false and fabricated. The learned Court felt that at the stage of taking cognizance on the basis of the police report it was not possible to come to a definite finding whether the accused had published the news item without deliberate and malicious intention. At such a stage the Court would just consider if there was ground for presuming that the accused had committed an offence. According to the learned trial Court at the stage of cognizance there is no scope to record a conclusion that the materials on record are not likely to lead to conviction at the end of the trial. After taking a view that it will be premature to say that there is no sufficient materials against the accused, the petition for discharge came to be rejected. Aggrieved, the accused-petitioner by means of this revision petition under Ss.397 and 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code called in question the correctness and validity of the said order dated 17-8-2001 of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate with a prayer for setting aside the said order and discharge the accused from the said proceeding.

2. I have heard Mr. A. K. Bhowmik, learned senior counsel and Mr. S. Ghosh, learned Counsel for the petitioner. I have also heard Mr. R. C. Debnath, learned Special P.P. for the respondent.

3. The news item which is a foundation of the present proceeding needs to be noticed at the outset. The English version of the same given in Annexure-3 to which no dispute was raised reads thus:

The para-military forces have unearthed a Blue Print of a plan of the terrorist in the Khowal town. Conversation of the extremists in Kokborak was heard in the wireless set of the BSF". The security forces came to know that the extremists' activities were being controlled from the office Tilla, which is the main center of the sub-division's administrations. The most thrilling incident is that the tribal students and employees residing in the vicinity of the town were used to hide arms and ammunitions in their houses. This was known from the letters recovered from the house


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top