IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
D. Biswas, and Anima Hazarika, J.
Smt. Dipti Doley Basumatary, Neepco Tribal Employee's Welfare Association, Adhu Kumar Basumatary and Bongaigaon Refinery and Petrochemicals Ltd. Tribal Employees' Welfare Association
Vs.
Union of India (UOI) and Ors.
Decided On: 27.02.2007
Income Tax - Scheduled Tribes - Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 10(26)
Fact of the Case:
The writ petitions were filed by members of Scheduled Tribes claiming exemption from Income Tax under Section 10(26) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The dispute centered around the interpretation of Section 10(26) in relation to the constitutional provisions defining Scheduled Tribes.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that to qualify for exemption under Section 10(26), a person must be a member of a Scheduled Tribe, must reside in specified tribal areas, and their income must accrue from sources in those areas. The court held that the petitioners were entitled to exemption if their respective tribes were recognized as Scheduled Tribes in the areas where they were residing.
Issues: Interpretation of Section 10(26) of the Income Tax Act in relation to the constitutional provisions defining Scheduled Tribes.
Ratio Decidendi: A member of a Scheduled Tribe residing in specified tribal areas and earning income from sources in those areas is entitled to exemption under Section 10(26) of the Income Tax Act, provided their tribe is recognized as a Scheduled Tribe in the areas where they reside.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ appeals with a direction to the Revenue to examine the case of the petitioners in light of the court's observation and to issue exemption certificates to those who fulfill the required criteria.
D. Biswas, Actg. C.J.
1. This batch of writ appeals arises out of a common judgment and order dated June 22, 2005, (see NEEPCO Tribal Employees' Welfare Association v. Union of India passed by the learned single judge of this court in Writ Petition (C) No. 200(SH) of 2001, Writ Petition (C) No. 340(SH) of 2002, Writ Petition (C) No. 14(SH) of 2004, Writ Petition (C) No. 15(SH) of 2004 and Miscellaneous Case No, 188 (SH) of 2001.
2. The writ petitions were filed claiming exemption from payment of Income Tax on the ground that the writ petitioners are members of the Schedules Tribes as defined in Clause (25) of Article 366 of the Constitution residing in the area specified either in Part I or Part II of the Table appended to paragraph 20 of the Sixth Schedule to the Constitution. Precisely, the dispute raised by the writ petitioners centres around the scope and ambit of Section 10(26) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, vis-a-vis the constitutional provisions. Before the question is addressed, we may recapitulate the factual background of each case in brief.
3. Writ Petition (C) No. 200(SH)/2001 has been filed by the NEEPCO Employees Welfare Association, a registered association, represented by its organising secretary. The association comprised of members belonging to the Scheduled Tribe community serving under the NEEPCO. They have been enjoying the benefits of tax exemption envisaged under Section 10(26) of the Income Tax Act by virtue of their status as members of the Scheduled Tribe community under Article 366(25) while they were posted within the specified areas mentioned in Section 10(26). The Income Tax Officer (TDS), Shillong, by the impugned letter dated June 29, 2001, instructed the Director (Finance), NEEPCO Limited, Shillong, to start deduction of Income Tax under Section 192 with effect from April 1, 2001, from the salary bills of the members of the petitioner-association for the reason that they are ineligible for exemption under Section 10(26) of the Act. The reason for such a direction is that the member of any scheduled community coming from outside the Sixth Schedule Area is not exempted from paying taxes under Section 10(26). Consequent thereupon, the concerned authority of NEEPCO by the letter dated July 20, 2001, called upon the members of the petitioner-association to furnish exemption certificates from the Income Tax authorities for calculation and deduction of Income Tax. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Shillong, by the impugned letter dated August 7, 2001, informed the NEEPCO authority that a member of a Scheduled Tribe community who is not ordinarily residing in the State of Nagaland, Manipur, Tripura, Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram or any area specified in Part I or Part II of the Table appended to paragraph 20 of the Sixth Schedule to the Constitution will not be eligible for exemption under Section 10(26) of the Act even though he may presently reside and derive income from any of the States or areas mentioned therein.
4. The petitioner in W.P. (C) No. 340(SH)/2002 is also a member of the Scheduled Tribe recognised in the State of Assam. She is also aggrieved by the impugned notice dated July 23, 2002, issued under Section 142 of the Income Tax Act directing her to file the return of her income. Her claim is that she is a member of the Kachari community in the State of Assam which is recognised as a Scheduled Tribe under the provisions of the Constitution.
5 The petitioner in W.P. (C) No. 14(SH)/2004 was serving as a deputy manager in the Power Grid Corporation of India, Shillong. She belongs to Miri (Mishing) tribe which is a recognised Scheduled Tribe in the State of Assam. Her application for tax exemption certificate was rejected and, consequent thereupon, her employer started deducting tax at source from her salary compelling her to file her return. She filed her return for the year ending March 31, 1999, claiming a refund of Rs. 13,064. The claim has been refused by the Assessing Officer by the order
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.