BIPLAB KUMAR SHARMA
Bijaya Goswami – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
B.K. Sharma, J.
1. This criminal petition has arisen out of two orders passed by the learned CJM, Kamrup in respect of committal of a case under Section 209 CrPC. While, by the first order, the learned CJM, Kamrup was of the opinion that the case is not one to be tried under Section 304 (Part-II) IPC, by the second order the case has been committed to the learned Sessions Court, Kamrup, Guwahati holding that the earlier order was an inadvertent mistake. It is the second order, aggrieved by which, the petitioners who are the accused have invoked the jurisdiction of this court under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of the said order.
2. Adverting to the facts of the case, the informant, represented by his learned Counsel in this proceeding had lodged an FIR with the Panbazar Police Station on 25.10.2004 alleging that his wife Smt. Monorama Kakati Bhuyan died in the operation theatre on 24.10.2004 due to the criminal negligence on the part of the Doctors involved in the operation. The FIR was registered as Paltan Bazar R.S. case No. 347/2004 under Section 304(A)/34 IPC corresponding to G.R. Case No. 4308/2004.
3. The police took up the investigation of the case and in due course
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.