SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Gau) 1036

I.A.ANSARI
Yumpi Padu – Appellant
Versus
Firoj Ahmed – Respondent


JUDGMENT

I.A. Ansari, J.

1. By making this application, under Section 482 read with Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner herein, who is an accused in CR Case No. 6241C/2005, has sought for setting aside the order, dated 1.10.2005, passed therein, by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup, taking cognizance of offences under Sections 447, 427, 341, 379 and 506 IPC read with Section 34 IPC against the present petitioner and some others and also directing issuance of summons to them.

2. I have heard Mr. S Ali, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. A Sattar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant-opposite party.

3. The law with regard to quashing of criminal complaint is no longer res integra. A catena of judicial decisions have settled the position of law on this aspect of the matter. I may refer to the case of R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab 1960 CriLJ 1239, wherein the question, which arose for consideration was whether a first information report can be quashed under Section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898. The Court held, on the facts before it, that no case for quashing of the proceeding was made out; but Gajendragadk




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top