SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Gau) 870

D.BISWAS, BROJENDRA PRASAD KATAKEY
Mukul Saikia – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.P. Katakey, J.

1. The appellants who are writ petitioners WP(C) No. 2026 of 2001, 2036 of 2001 and 4932 of 2001, by present appeals have challenged the common judgment and order dated 14.8.2003 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing a batch of writ petitions including the present concerned writ petitions.

2. The Writ Petition No. 2026 of 2001 as well as 2036 of 2001 have been filed by the appellants in Writ Appeal No. 8 of 2005 praying for a direction to the State respondents to fill up 27 posts of Child Development Project Officer (C.D.P.O)/probation officer pursuant to the advertisement dated 19.8.1997 and also to fill up all anticipated vacancies that had arisen on or after the date of advertisement till the completion of selection process from amongst the candidates whose names appeared in the select list dated 17.7.2000. The Writ Petition(C) No. 4932 of 2001 has been filed by the appellants in W.A. No. 471 of 2003 challenging the Cabinet memorandum dated 16.6.2000 circulated by the Commissioner and Secretary, Government of Assam, Social and Welfare Department under Rule 17 of Assam, Rules of Executive Business relating to the regularisation of 18 C.D.P.Os./proba
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top