SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Gau) 667

I.A.ANSARI
M. L. Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent


ORDER

I.A. Ansari, J.

1. By this order, I propose to dispose of all the criminal petitions enlisted above, which have arisen out of the applications made under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482, Cr.P.C. against the orders, dated 13-4-2007 passed, in Special Case Nos. 5/2006 to 20/2006, whereby the learned Special Judge, CBI, Guwahati, Assam, has rejected the prayer made by the present petitioners, who are accused in the cases aforementioned, to amalgamate and try all the cases together as one case.

2. Broadly speaking, the facts leading to the impugned order are that during the year 1995-98, the Telecom Department, which is, now, known as BSNL, awarded contracts to various contractors for the purpose of trenching of various parts of Imphal-Moreh route and Imphal-Chandrapur route, on National High Way No. 37, in the State of Manipur, and laying of optical fibre cables oh the routes aforementioned, which were divided into several sub-sections. Following the execution of the contract works, so awarded, and payment of the bills made, in this regard, several First Information Reports came to be registered against various contractors, who had been awarded the co

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top