SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Gau) 265

HRISHIKESH ROY
Deepak Kumar Poddar – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


ORDER

Hrishikesh Roy, J.

1. Heard Dr. A.K. Saraf, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner assisted by A. Goyal. Also heard Mr. R. Dubey, learned Counsel for the respondents.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court challenging the decision dated April 9, 2004 of the District Level Committee, whereby it has been held that the petitioner unit, in respect of the process of filtration of raw mustard oil to make mustard oil, is not entitled to the benefit of sales tax exemption notified through notification dated September 20, 1997 issued by the Government of Assam in exercise of powers under Section 9(4) of the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 (herein after referred to as, "the Act"). Consequent correction of the eligibility certificate granted to the petitioner as well as the assessment of tax against the petitioner vide order dated July 9, 2004 passed by the Superintendent of Taxes, Goalpara have also been challenged in the instant writ petition.

3. Dr. A.K. Saraf, the learned Senior Counsel has submitted that the petitioner unit was set up in order to obtain the benefit of sales tax exemption granted by the notification dated September 20, 1997. After the unit was set up
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top