SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Gau) 208

RANJAN GOGOI
Jogendra Chandra Kar – Appellant
Versus
Haradhan Saha – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ranjan Gogoi, J.

1. The ambit of the expression "...accidents involving the death of, or bodily injury to persons arising out of the use of Motor Vehicles...." as appearing in Section 165 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is the precise issue arising for the courts determination in the present case. The said question arises in the following facts.

2. The claim case out of which this appeal has arisen had been instituted by the respondent who are the parents of one late Amar Chandra Kar who was a T.S.R. Personnel. On 25.5.1993 the deceased was returning from Rajchantai by a vehicle bearing Registration No. TRT 1556 (Jeep). He along with other TSR personnel were proving security cover to the staff of the Rubber Board who were carrying money withdrawn from the Bank for payment of salary. When the vehicle reached a spot near Rajchantai, extremists opened fire on the vehicle as a result of which Amar Chandra Kar along with another Rifleman and the driver of the Vehicle died on the spot. Death was on account of bullet injuries suffered. Claiming that their son had died in a vehicular accident, the claimants instituted a claim proceeding registered and numbered as TS (MAC) 101/93 befo























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top