SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Gau) 793

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
B. Sudershan Reddy, C.J. and Brojendra Prasad Katakey, J.
Gokul Mohan Hazarika and Ors. - Appellants
Vs.
State of Assam and Ors. - Respondent
Writ Appeal No. 5 of 2002
Decided On: 24.08.2006

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: P.K. Goswami and A.M. Buzarbaruah, Advs.
For Respondents/Defendant: Babita Goyal, Adv.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the unamended 1960 Rules will govern the recruitment and the seniority of direct recruits and promotees appointed in 1986 should be fixed in terms of such rules.

Headnote:

Seniority - Assam Civil Services - Assam Civil Services (Class I) Rules, 1960 - Rule 4, Rule 19 - The court discussed the application of unamended 1960 Rules in fixing the seniority between direct recruits and promotees made in 1986. The court held that the unamended rules will govern the recruitment and the seniority of direct recruits and promotees appointed in 1986 should be fixed in terms of such rules. The court also emphasized the application of proviso to Rule 4 and Rule 19 in determining the seniority, and set aside the judgment to direct the State Respondents to fix the seniority of all 45 direct recruits just below the first 45 promotees promoted to ACS Class I service.

Fact of the Case:

The Appellants, directly recruited as Assam Civil Services Class I officers in 1986, challenged the draft gradation list and the amended provision contained in proviso to Rule 4 of the Assam Civil Services (Class I) Rules, 1960. They sought the fixation of seniority in terms of the unamended provision of the Rules.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the unamended 1960 Rules will govern the recruitment and the seniority of direct recruits and promotees appointed in 1986 should be fixed in terms of such rules. The court set aside the judgment and directed the State Respondents to fix the seniority of all 45 direct recruits just below the first 45 promotees promoted to ACS Class I service.

Issues: The main issue was whether the unamended 1960 Rules or the amended provision should govern the fixation of seniority between direct recruits and promotees made in 1986.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the unamended rules will govern the recruitment and the seniority of direct recruits and promotees appointed in 1986 should be fixed in terms of such rules. The court also highlighted the application of proviso to Rule 4 and Rule 19 in determining the seniority.

Final Decision: The appeal and the writ petition filed by the Appellants were allowed, and the State Respondents were directed to fix the seniority of all 45 direct recruits just below the first 45 promotees promoted to ACS Class I service.

JUDGMENT

B.P. Katakey, J.

1. The Appellants, who are directly recruited as Assam Civil Services Class I officers in the year 1986, filed the writ petition in Civil Rule No. 1869 of 1995 challenging the draft gradation list, as on 1.1.1993, of the officers of Assam Civil Services, for placing them after the promotees of that year, i.e., 1986 and also challenging the amended provision contained in proviso to Rule 4 of the Assam Civil Services (Class I) Rules, 1960, amended by the Assam Civil Services (Class-I) (Amendment) Rules, 1986 and notified on 21.7.1986. Though the Appellants in the said writ petition have challenged the vires of said amended provision, the claim of the Appellants is basically the fixation of seniority, which according to them ought to have been fixed in terms of the unamended provision of Assam Civil Service (Class I) Rules, 1960, as stood prior to 1986 amendment, as the process for direct recruitment was initiated and selection was completed prior to the amendment of the said Rules, The learned Single Judge by the impugned judgment and order, by placing reliance on the decision of the Apex Court in Dr. K. Ramalu v. Dr. S. Surya Prakash Ramalu (1997) 3 SCC 59, dismissed the writ petition filed by the Appellants basically on the ground that though the process for selection was initiated before the amendment of 1986, the Government having taken a conscious decision not to make any appointment till the rule is amended, no interference can be made Hence, the present appeal.

2. The facts in brief is that the Government of Assam on 7.3.1984 requested the Assam Public Service Commission (APSC) to make selection for direct recruitment to 30 number of posts in each category of ACS Class I and ACS Class II and accordingly an advertisement was issued by the APSC on 2.5.1984 for that purpose. The Government of Assam in the meantime vide communication dated 24.11.1984 informed APSC about relaxation of upper age limit by two years and accordingly a revised advertisement was issued by the APSC on 28.11.1984 incorporating the relaxation of two years in the upper age limit. Pursuant to such process of selection the written test as required under Assam Civil Services (Class I) Rules, 1960 ('1960 Rules') was conducted by the APSC, between the period of 5.6.1985 to 1.8.1985 and declared the result of the written examination on 22.2.1986. The APSC conducted the viva-voice test from 25.4.1986 to 30.5.1986 of those candidate who qualified in such written examination. After such process of interview, the APSC on 27.6.1986 send the list of candidates to the Government recommended for appointment as ACS Class I and ACS Class II officers. The Government of Assam thereafter by the impugned notification dated 21.7.1986 amended the proviso to Rule 4 of 1960 Rules, whereby the quota for promotion from ACS Class II to ACS Class I was left to the discretion of the Governor and the earlier quota of 50 per cent each between the promotees and direct recruit was done away with. By the said amendment the eligibility criteria for promotion from ACS II to ACS I was also reduced from 8 years to 5 years. By notification dated 11.9.1986,129 ACS Class II officers were promoted to ACS Class I, which includes the present private Respondents and thereafter during the month of October 1986 the Government appointed 45 selected candidates in ACS Class I (Jr. Grade) pursuant to the recommendation of the APSC dated 27.6.1986. A decision for merger of ACS Class I and ACS Class II was thereafter taken by the Government and accordingly on 16.12.1989 both ACS Class I and ACS Class II were merged into a common class, i.e., ACS Class I. A draft gradation list was published in the month of June 1993 wherein all 129 ACS Class II officers who were promoted to ACS Class I vide notification dated 11.9.1986 were placed above those 45 directly recruited ACS Class I officers, who were recruited in the month of October 1986 pursuant to the APSC recommendation dated 27.6.198
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top