SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Gau) 360

I.A.ANSARI, MAIBAM B.K.SINGH
Hugie Zeliang – Appellant
Versus
State of Nagaland – Respondent


JUDGMENT

I.A. Ansari, J.

1. The appellant Nos. 1 and 2 herein were, initially, appointed, on 9.3.1982 and 4.12.1982, respectively, in the scale of pay of Rs. 260,425, as Computer, in the Directorate of Evaluation, which falls under the Department of Planning and Coordination, Government of Nagaland. While the appellant No. 1 was promoted to the post of Evaluation Inspector/Investigator (Class-II Gazetted) on 5.12.1987, in the scale of pay of Rs. 640,1445, the appellant No. 2 was promoted to the post of Evaluation Inspector/Investigator on 3.7.1987, with effect from 22.6.1987, in the same scale of pay as mentioned hereinbefore. By Notification, dated 27.6.1993, the appellant No. 2 was promoted to the post of Evaluation Officer ('EO') in the scale of pay of Rs. 1,800-3,700 and has continued in the same capacity till date; whereas the appellant No. 2 was promoted, vide Notification, dated 10.6.1994, to the post of EO (Class-II Gazetted), on officiating basis, in the scale of pay as indicated hereinbefore and has continued till date.

2. The private respondent Nos. 3 and 5, both of whom were Inspector of Statistics (Class-III Non-Gazetted), which fall under the Directorate of Economics and
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top