T. Vaiphei, J.

1. This Revision petition, wrongly registered as a writ petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the judgment and order dated 24.11.2005 passed by the learned Additional Deputy Commissioner, Shillong in FAO No. 19(T) 2004 upholding the order dated 18.10.2004 passed by the learned Assistant to Deputy Commissioner, Shillong in Title Suit No. 25(T) 1992 rejecting the prayer of the petitioner for impleading him as one of the defendants in the suit.

2. I have heard Mr. R. Choudhury, the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.F. Qureshi, the learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1, I have also heard Mrs. R D.B. Baruah, the learned Counsel for the respondent No. 2.

The facts, which are not in dispute for disposal of this revision petition, are that the petitioner, claiming himself to be the co-owner of the suit property situated at Nongthymmai, by virtue of inheritance from his father the late Satyanand Verma, filed an application under Order I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure before the learned Assistant to Deputy Commissioner, Shillong for adding him as one of the defendants in the suit filed by the respondent No. 1