AMITAVA ROY
Bisha Mia – Appellant
Versus
Natub Ali – Respondent
Amitava Roy, J.
1. The Appellants/Defendants have impugned the judgment dated 17.11.2004 and the decree dated 29.11.2004 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Barpeta, in Title Appeal No. 24/2003 affirming the judgment dated 22.8.2003 and decree dated 27.8.2003 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) No. I, Barpeta, in Title Suit No. 33/01, decreeing the suit of the Respondents/Plaintiffs.
2. I have heard Mr. MH Rajborbhuiya, learned Counsel for the Appellants. For the order, which I propose to pass, issuance of notice on the Respondents is not necessary.
3. The Respondents filed Title Suit No. 33/01 against the Appellants/Defendants and two proforma Defendants praying for a decree inter alia for declaration of their right, title and interest in the suit land and for confirmation of possession thereof. The land involved in the suit was described to be measuring 6 bighas 2 kathas 1 lechas covered by Dag No. 72 under KP Patta No. 119 situated at village Gadesali Pam, mauza Sarukhetri, District Barpeta, Assam. The Respondents/Plaintiffs' pleaded case in short is that their father late Neshu Seikh held annual patta of the land which was eventually converted
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.