IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Biplab Kumar Sharma, J.
Tarani Talukdar and Anr. - Appellants
Vs.
Union of India (UOI) and Ors. - Respondent
WP (C) No. 7878 of 2002
Decided On: 22.06.2004
Appointment - Refusal to Join Duty - 17th Bn. Kohima - [The Assam Rifles Act, 1941 - Section 3(1)(b), The Assam Rifles Rules, 1946 - Rule 3] - The court discussed the appointment of constables in the 17th Bn. Kohima and the refusal to allow the petitioners to join their duties. The court highlighted the principles of natural justice and administrative fair play, and emphasized the arbitrariness and unreasonableness of the respondents' actions in negating the appointment of the petitioners.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners were selected for appointment as constables in the 17th Bn. Kohima, but were refused joining their duties due to alleged deficiency in height. The respondents failed to provide a written explanation for the refusal, leading the petitioners to file a writ petition seeking direction to join their duty.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the respondents' actions to be arbitrary and in violation of the principles of natural justice. It held that the appointment of the petitioners could not have been set aside in the manner done by the respondents, emphasizing the lack of written order cancelling the appointment and the absence of communication to the petitioners.
Issues: The main issue was whether the respondents' refusal to allow the petitioners to join their duties was in conformity with the requirement not to act arbitrarily in such a matter.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the appointment became a concluded contract upon the petitioners' acceptance and reporting for duty, and highlighted the importance of communication of the order of appointment to the person being appointed. It also stressed the principles of natural justice and administrative fair play.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, granting the prayers made therein. The respondents were directed to take appropriate action towards implementing the appointment of the petitioners and allowing them to join their duties within two months from the date of the judgment.
B.K. Sharma, J.
1. Apathy on the part of the respondents in the matter of appointment even after selection and offering of appointment and reporting for duty, what has been alleged in this writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to allow the petitioners to join their duty.
2. The facts as narrated in the writ petition are in a narrow conspectus. Pursuant to a recruitment rally conducted by the respondents which included physical and medical check up, written and viva-voce test, the petitioners were selected for appointment as constable. The selection tests were conducted on 6th, 7th and 8th of February, 2002 and the team which conducted the test included the Commandant and Chief Medical Officers along with others.
3. The petitioners were offered appointment by letter of appointment dated 9.9.2002 and they were appointed as Constable (GD) in the establishment of 17th Bn. Kohima in the scale of pay of Rs. 3050 -4590/-. As per direction contained in the letters of appointment the petitioners reported for their duty on 25.9.2002. Upon such reporting for duty, they were referred to the hospital at the Group Centre, SSB, Kohima for medical check up on 26.9.2002. The attending Doctor there, advised the petitioners to get certain tests such as X-ray, P.A. view test, Chest EGG, VDRL test, blood test, urine test etc. The petitioners submitted themselves for all the medical tests and the medical reports furnished to them were duly deposited to the authority at Kohima on 27.9.2002.
4. However, without assigning any reason the petitioners were re fused joining when they reported for the same on 27.9.2202 itself. Their persuasions for the same failed and nothing was intimated to them in writing. Situated thus, they had no option than to come back. According to the petitioners when they could successfully complete the physical and medical tests conducted during selection, nothing could prevent them from joining their duties and that too in absence of anything adverse to their such joining which otherwise would have been intimated to them in writing. Be it stated here that the physical tests, which the petitioners has undergone during the selection, included their height test/measurement also.
5. Failure to receive any response from the respondents as to the reason or reasons for not allowing the petitioners to join their duties towards materialising their appointment eventually forced the petitioners to invoke the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filling the writ petition.
6. The respondents have responded to the writ petition by filling their affidavit-in-opposition. The stand of the respondents while admitting all other material fact is that both the petitioners upon examination by the Medical Officer of the concerned Battalion found to be deficient in their height by 1 (one) Commissioner. As per the report of the Medical Officer, both the petitioners having not fulfilled the requisite physical standard (height) for recruitment as Constable (GD), their appointment was not considered by the Commandant of the 17th Bn. According to the respondents the minimum height required for the purpose for the candidates belonging to Assam is 162.5 and the petitioners height reported by the Medical Officer at Kohima to be of 161.5 i.e. one centimetre short than the minimum standard height.
7. According to the respondents the aforesaid position led to the forfeiture of the appointment of the petitioners and the Head Clerk of the 17th Bn, SSB, Kohima in the office had briefed them of the same.
8. Ms. M. Pathak, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners strenuously argued that the entire episode leading to refusal to allow the petitioners to join their posts smacks malafide and colourable exercise of power. She submitted that the petitioners having been selected on the basis of their eligibility which included the physical test which naturally also included the requirement of minimum standard of height, the Medical Officer at Kohima co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.