SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Gau) 202

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (AIZAWL BENCH)
Brojendra Prasad Katakey, J.
Hmingdailova Khiangte – Appellants
Vs.
Chief Secy., Govt. of Mizoram and Anr. – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 53 of 2004
Decided On: 10.03.2005

Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Lalramzauva, A.R. Malhotra and R. Lalduhawmi, Advs.
For Respondents/Defendant: P. Pathak and N. Sailo, Advs.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a fair hearing and enquiry before the dissolution of a statutory body, as well as the court's power to direct the reconstitution of the body and hold elections for its office bearers.

Headnote:

Sports Council Dissolution - Mizoram States Sports Council - Mizoram States Sports Council Act, 2002, Section 6, 7, 28, 39 - The court found that the dissolution of the Sports Council was illegal and arbitrary due to the violation of principles of natural justice. The court directed the State Respondents to reconstitute the Council and hold elections for the Vice-President and Joint Secretary within one month.

Fact of the Case:

The Vice-President of Mizoram States Sports Council challenged the notifications dissolving the Council, alleging violation of natural justice and arbitrary exercise of power.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the dissolution of the Sports Council to be illegal and arbitrary due to the absence of a fair hearing and enquiry before the dissolution. The court directed the State Respondents to reconstitute the Council and hold elections for the Vice-President and Joint Secretary within one month.

Issues: Violation of natural justice, arbitrary exercise of power, legality of the dissolution of the Sports Council

Ratio Decidendi: The dissolution of the Sports Council was found to be illegal and arbitrary due to the absence of a fair hearing and enquiry before the dissolution. The court directed the reconstitution of the Council and the holding of elections for the Vice-President and Joint Secretary within one month.

Final Decision: The court directed the State Respondents to reconstitute the Council and hold elections for the Vice-President and Joint Secretary within one month. The writ petition was disposed of, and a cost of Rs.5,000/- was awarded to the writ Petitioner for the illegal action of the State Respondents.

JUDGMENT

B.P. Katakey, J.

1. The writ Petitioner, who was the Vice-President of Mizoram States Sports Council, has filed the present writ petition challenging the notifications dated 16.6.2004 (Annexure-6) and 18.6.04 (Annexure-7) issued by the Commissioner and Secretary, Sports, Youth Service Department, Government of Mizoram dissolving the Mizoram States Sports Council constituted Under Section 6 of the Mizoram States Sports Council Act, 2002 in exercise of the power Under Section 28 of the said Act and authorizing the Commissioner and the Secretary to the Government of Mizoram Sports and Youth Services Department to conduct day to day function of the States Sports Council, in exercise of the power Under Section 39 of the said Act till such time, the full time Secretary of the State Council is appointed or till the Mizoram Sports Council is re-constituted.

2. I have heard Mr. Lalramzauva, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Advocate General, assisted by Mr. N. Sailo, the learned State Counsel, appearing on behalf of the Respondents.

3. The facts leading to the filing of the present writ petition in brief, is that Mizoram State Sports Council (hereinafter referred to as the Sports council) was constituted by the Government of Mizoram in the year, 1976 for the purpose of promotion of sports amongst the Mizos in the State of Mizoram on the basis of an executive order. Thereafter the Government finding it expedient to constitute a sports council at the State level for securing greater measure for participation of the people in the sports and games and its promotion and to invest such sports council such special power for carrying out object of promotion and development of the games and the sport in the State of Mizoram, promulgated Mizoram State Sports Council Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). The Government of Mizoram in terms of the provisions of Section 3 read with Section 6and 7 of the said Act, constituted the Sports Council vide notification dated 21.8.2002 (Annexure 2). The election for the Vice-President and the Joint Secretary was thereafter held on 12.11.02 wherein, the present writ Petitioner was elected as Vice-President and Mr. Lungmuana as Joint Secretary. While the said executive body of the Sports Council was functioning w.e.f. 12.11.02 with the present writ Petitioner as the elected Vice President, the Government of Mizoram issued a notification dated 16.6.04 and corrigendum dated 17.6.04, in purported exercise of power Under Section 28of the Act, dissolving the sports council constituted Under Section 6 of the said Act with immediate effect, as the State Government was of the opinion that the said Sports council has not been able to carry out its objectives to its satisfaction. By another notification dated 18.6.04, and corrigendum dated 23.6.04, the Govt., of Mizoram in exercise of its power Under Section 39 of the Act authorized the Commissioner and Secretary, the Respondent No. 2 to conduct day to day functioning of the sports Council till such time a full time Secretary of the council is appointed or the Sports council is re-constituted. The writ Petitioner has challenged both this notifications dated 16.6.04 and 18.6.04 on the ground that the same were issued in complete violation of principles of natural justice and without application of mind and also on the ground of arbitrary exercise of the power.

4. Mr. Lalramzuava, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that the writ Petitioner, being the representative of a recognized State level sports association, was inducted as the Member of the Sports Council and thereafter, he was elected as the Vice-President by the members of Sports Council in terms of the provisions of Section 7(2) of the said Act. The learned Counsel has further submitted that the Sports Council constituted vide notification dated 21.8.02 started functioning after the election to the post of Vice-President and the Joint Secretary was over Gov





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top