SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Gau) 336

I.A.ANSARI
Biswanath Debbarma – Appellant
Versus
Sumitra Debbarma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: S. Deb, Adv.
For Respondents/Defendant: S. Sana, Adv.

ORDER

I.A. Ansari, J.

1. This criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. is directed against the order, dated 22.12.2004, passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Agartala, Tripura West, in Misc. Case No. 37 of 2004, whereby the present petitioner, as the second party in the proceeding, has been directed to pay, in all, Rs. 3,000 to the opposite party herein and their minor female child as maintenance allowance @ Rs. 1,500 each per month and the authorities concerned have been directed to deduct every month the said maintenance allowance from the salary of the petitioner-second party and remit the same by money order to the first party-opposite party herein.

2. Heard Mr. S. Deb, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Mr. S. Saha, learned counsel for the opposite party.

3. The order, dated 22.12.2004, aforementioned has been challenged on the ground that the same is in violation of provisions of Section 17 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, and also contrary to the provisions contained in the proviso (ia) to Sub-section (1) of Section 60 of the CPC.

4. For the purpose of appreciating the grievances raised by the second party-petitioner, the material facts, which have led t













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top