B.K. Sharma, J.

1. The issue involved in both the criminal revisions is the same and thus as agreed to by the learned Counsel for the parties, were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order. While in the first case, the proceeding is concerned with complaint Case No. 173(C) of 2003 pending in the Court of learned SDJM (S) Tinsukia, in the second proceeding it is concerned with the complaint Case No. 174 (C) of 2003 pending in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tinsukia. Both the proceedings are in respect of the same very Petitioner. However, the complainants in both the proceedings are different. But the nature of the complaint in both the proceedings is the same and the issue involved is also same. Hence the facts as involved in the first case is taken up for consideration. Suffice is to say that while in the first case the, cheque in question stated to have been bounced/returned is for an amount of Rs. 18,00,000/- in the second case, the cheque amount is Rs. 20,00,000/-

2. By the application being criminal revision No. 427 of 2003 filed Under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, the Petitioner seeks quashing of the cr