I.A.ANSARI
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Gauri Roy – Respondent
I.A. Ansari, J.
1. It is not uncommon for a Court of law to face challenge to its own jurisdiction and authority. It is not unusual that a Court of law is invited to decide if it has the jurisdiction in a given case and, if so, what are the parameters of its jurisdiction and powers. When such a question is raised, the Court cannot ignore or brush aside the question so posed and must decide the same in accordance with law. If the Court finds that it has no jurisdiction, it shall have no hesitation in saying so; but if it finds that it has the jurisdiction, it must boldly declare so and lay down the ambits of its own powers.
2. The legitimacy of the power of the Courts to review legislative action has been one of the most debated questions in the Indian Legal History. While presenting his views on the significance of Article 25, which corresponds to the present Article 32 of the Constitution of India, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the Constituent Assembly, expressed himself as follows:
If I was asked to name any particular article in his Constitution as the most important-an article without which this Constitution would be a nullity-I could not refer to a
Sadhana Lodh v. National Insurance Company Ltd. and Anr. (2003) 3 SCC 524
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997) 3 SCC 261 : 1997 (1) GLT (SC) 1
Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225
Minerva Mills (P) Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) 3 SCC 625
K. Venkatachalam v. A. Swamickan and Anr. (1999) 4 SCC 526
Waryam Singh and Anr. v. Amarnath and Anr. AIR 1954 SC 215
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.