SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Gau) 603

BIPLAB KUMAR SHARMA
Abdul Qadir Siddique – Appellant
Versus
State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.K. Sharma, J.

1. This writ petition is directed against the order by which the petitioner who is on deputation in the borrowing department has been repatriated to his parent department.

2. Briefly stated the facts material for the purpose of disposal of the instant writ petition are that the petitioner was first appointed as Instructor in the department of Industries w.e.f. 9.3.92 pursuant to Annexure-I advertisement dated 9.4.98 issued by the Arunachal Pradesh Energy Development Agency (APEDA) inviting applications for filling up two posts of Project Officer (PO) (Energy) on standard deputation terms initially for a period of two years, the petitioner offered his candidature for one such posts. Pursuant to selection etc., the petitioner was appointed as a PO under APEDA by Annexure-III order dated 4.9.2000. He was so appointed with the following terms and conditions:

Office of the Director

Arunachal Pradesh Energy

Development Agency

Land Survey Hostel Building (1st Floor)

Post Box No. 141, Itanagar-791111

No. APEDA/E-116/2000 Dt. Itanagar, the 4th

Sept. 2000

ORDER

Consequent upon recommendation of the selection committee, the following Officers are hereby appointed as Project Offic














































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top