BROJENDRA PRASAD KATAKEY
Kundargaon Anti Eviction Action Committee – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
B.P. Katakey, J.
1. The petitioner, by the present writ petition, has prayed for directing the respondents not to evict the members of the petitioner's committee from the land under their occupation and also to consider the application filed by them for grant of settlement of the land they are possessing.
2. I have heard Mr. M. Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Addl. Advocate General, Assam for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Mrs. Milli Hazarika, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 4, Assam Industrial Development Corporation Limited.
3. Mr. Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the members of the petitioner's committee, 18 in number, named in annexure 2 to the writ petition, are possessing the land measuring about 3 Bs each for last more than 70 years and as such, they acquire bona fide right of claim over the land under their possession due to the long and uninterrupted possession and, therefore, the land which was initially a Village Grazing Reserve (V.G.R.) and subsequently, de-reserved and became government khas land ought to have been settled in their favour pursuant to the application
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.