ANIMA HAZARIKA
Ashutosh Choudhury – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
A. Hazarika, J.
1. By way of filing this revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 and 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Petitioners have prayed for quashing the order dated 5.7.99 and the charges dated 5.7.99.
2. Three accused have questioned the legality of the order dated 5.7.99 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Karimganj in Sessions Case No. 37/98 corresponding to Karimganj P.S. Case No. 363/96 (G.R. Case No. 824/96) framing charges under Sections 341/34, 326/34 and 307/34against two of the accused being accused No. 2 and 3 and under Section 109/341, 109/326 and109/307 I.P.C. against the Petitioner.
3. Charges have been framed by the learned Sessions Judge, Karimganj, holding that there are prima facie materials to warrant grounds for presuming that the accused persons have committed the offences under Sections as mentioned hereinabove. The learned Sessions Judge has come to the said conclusions while framing the charges, on the following materials on record viz:
i) The first information report.
ii) The police report dated 21.2.97 wherein name of 10 (Ten) witnesses were shown to have proved the case on behalf of prosecution along with seizure lis
Union of India v. Prafulla Kumar Samal and Anr. (1979) 3 SCC 4;
Dilawar Balu Kurane v. State of Maharashtra (2002) 2 SCC 135;
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Ram Kishan Rohtagi and Ors. AIR 1983 SC 67;
State of Haryana and Ors. v. Bhajan Lal and Anr. (1992) Supp. (1) SCC 335 : AIR 1992 SC 604;
State of Karnataka v. M. Devendrappa and Anr. (2002) 3 SCC 89;
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.