SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Gau) 835

RANJAN GOGOI
Jogeswar Borah – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: J. Deka, Adv.
For Respondents/Defendant: G. Soren, Adv.

JUDGMENT

Ranjan Gogoi, J.

1. Heard Mr. J. Deka, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. G. Soren, Learned Government Advocate, Assam appearing on behalf of the official Respondents.

2. The facts of the case, as revealed by the pleadings on record, reveal a some what depressing picture. The writ Petitioner, who is the registered owner of a truck bearing Registration No. ASN-6786, has been, for the last 6/7 years, knocking the doors of various authorities including the Courts for release of his truck, which he contends to be the only source of livelihood. Not having received any positive response, he has invoked the extra-ordinary powers of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution essentially seeking the release of his truck, which has been under seizure/confiscation since 3.11.1998 for its alleged involvement with a forest offence.

3. The recital of the facts could begin by taking 3.11.1998, i.e., the date of the seizure of the Petitioner's truck, as the starting point. Next came an order of confiscation by the Authorized Officer acting under Regulation 49 of the Assam Forest Regulation. The Petitioner availed of the legal remedy by filing an appeal before the learned Session





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top