SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Gau) 487

R.B.MISRA
Subrata Talukdar – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: K. Paul, Adv.
For Respondents/Defendant: K.C. Mahanta, Adv.

JUDGMENT

R.B. Misra, J.

1. Heard Mr. K. Paul, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. K.C. Mahanta, learned Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Despite notice none appears for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5. However, as per office report these Respondents are duly served.

2. In this petition prayer has been made to quash the order dated 8.6.2000 (Annexure 'J' to the writ petition) passed by the Secretary, Laharighat, Samabai Samiti Ltd. (in short the Samity), whereby in reference to the Resolution No. 5 dated 14.4.2000 the Petitioner was dismissed from service.

3. The brief facts necessary for adjudication of the writ petition are that the Petitioner was working as Office Assistant in the said 'Samiti' from 20.2.1977 and while in service, he was alleged to have been involved in misappropriation of the fund, financial irregularities, dereliction of duties and also misappropriating the sale proceeds in 'Samiti' for which Petitioner was placed under suspension with effect from 18.5.96 but, he was not even paid his subsistence allowances for a period of three years and neither any charge sheet was served over him nor any disciplinary proceeding was initiated. When




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top