P.P.NAOLEKAR, AFTAB H.SAIKIA
Radhey Shyam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
P.P. Naolekar, J.
1. That the petitioner-appellant was the Subedar in the Armed Force on 2.11.93. While the appellant was proceeding to join the 4 Rajput Regiment at Jammu, he was detained by the Railway Protection Force's Inspector at Dimapur for alleged possession of ganja. Later on, he was handed over to the army. On 24.10.96, the appellant was charged under Section 69 of the Army Act, 1950 for committing the civil offence i.e., possessing ganja in contravention to Section 20(b)(i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and also under Section 39(a) of the Army Act, 1950 for absenting himself from his unit without leave from 16.9.90 to 2.11.93. After undertaking necessary procedural requirements, the appellant was tried by the General Court Martial and was punished for 4 years rigorous imprisonment and dismissed from service having been found guilty of the charge of unlawful possession of ganja in violation of Section 20(b)(i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The appellant was absolved from the charges of absenting himself without leave from his unit. The punishment imposed by the General Court Martial was challenged in the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.