IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Iqbal Ahmed Ansari, J.
Krishna Kanta Das
Vs.
State of Assam
Criminal Appeal No. 30 of 2003
Decided On: 26.05.2004
Forgery - Criminal Law - Indian Penal Code, Section 489B - Summary: The court found the accused guilty of tendering fake currency notes to a bank for obtaining a bank draft. However, the court held that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized currency notes were fake, as the expert witness did not provide sufficient reasons for his opinion. The court emphasized that suspicion cannot replace proof and acquitted the accused under the benefit of doubt.
Fact of the Case:
The accused was convicted under Section 489B IPC for tendering fake currency notes to a bank for obtaining a bank draft. The accused denied the allegations, and the prosecution presented evidence from bank employees and an expert witness from the Reserve Bank of India.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that while there was strong suspicion against the accused, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized currency notes were fake. The court emphasized the lack of conclusive evidence and the importance of proof in criminal cases.
Issues: The main issue was whether the accused tendered fake currency notes to the bank, and if the prosecution provided sufficient evidence to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that in criminal cases, the burden of proof rests entirely on the prosecution, and suspicion cannot replace proof. The court also highlighted the importance of expert opinions being supported by reasons and data.
Final Decision: The court acquitted the accused under the benefit of doubt and set aside the impugned judgment and order, holding the accused not guilty of the charge framed against him under Section 489B IPC.
I.A. Ansari, J.
1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 27-12-2002, passed by the learned ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Kamrup, convicting the accused-appellant Under Section 489B IPC and sentencing him to suffer simple imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- and, in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of six months.
2. The case against the accused-appellant, as projected at the trial, was, in brief, as follows :
On 12-03-1997, accused-appellant, Sri Krishna Kanta Das, an employee of M/s Assam Tribune Private Limited, came to the United Bank of India, Fancy Bazar Branch, for obtaining a Bank Draft and in the process of tendering the currency notes for the purpose of obtaining the draft, he tendered as many as six fake currency notes of Rs. 500/-denomination each. The cashier, at the bank, in the process of counting the said currency notes, found six of the notes as fake and brought the same, immediately, to the notice of the Branch Manager, Saradandu Bhattacharjee. On a telephonic inquiry made by the Branch Manager, M/s Assam Tribune Private Limited informed the Branch Manager that they had not sent any currency note of Rs. 500/- denomination. When the process was on to determine as to whether the notes tendered by the accused-appellant were fake or not, the accused-appellant appeared there and, upon coming to know that six of the currency notes tendered by him to the bank were being considered as fake, he snatched away the said notes, put the same into his mouth, but when he was chewing the said notes, he was overpowered by the bank employees with the help of their security guard and the said fake notes were recovered from the possession of the accused-appellant. On the First Information Report being lodged by the said Branch Manager, police registered a case against the accused-appellant and a search of the person of the accused-appellant by police also led to the recovery of two more fake notes, one of Rs. 10/- denomination and the other one was of Rs. 100/-denomination, whereupon the police seized the said fake notes, got the same examined by one Prabhat Goswami, Treasurer of Reserve Bank of India, who opined that the said seized currency notes were fake ones. On completion of the investigation, chargesheet was laid against the accused-appellant Under Section 489B IPC.
3. During trial, the accused-appellant pleaded not guilty to the charge framed against him Under Section 489B IPC. In support of their case, prosecution examined five witnesses. The learned trial Court also examined, as a Court witness, Nihar Ranjan Mazumdar, who was cash clerk of United Bank of India, at the relevant time, at its said Branch and to whom the currency notes were allegedly tendered by the accused-appellant for the purpose of obtaining the bank draft. The accused-appellant was, then, examined Under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and in his examination aforementioned, the accused-appellant denied that he had committed the offence alleged to have been committed by him, the case of the defence being that the accused-appellant never handed over any fake note as alleged by the prosecution witnesses and no fake currency note was ever found in his possession. No evidence was, however, adduced by the defence. On the conclusion of the trial, the learned trial Court found the accused guilty of the charge framed against him and convicted him accordingly and passed sentence against him as hereinabove mentioned.
4. I have heard Mr. J. M. Choudhury, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. D. M. Choudhury, and Mr. A. Bora, learned counsel for the accused-appellant, and Mr. F.H. Laskar, learned Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondents.
5. From the evidence of PW 1 (Saradindu Bhattacharjee) who was, at the relevant time, Manager of United Bank of India, at Fancy Bazar, it transpires that on 12-03-1997, while he was working as Manager at UBI, Fancy Bazar, at about 12/12.30 PM
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.