SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Gau) 383

I.A.ANSARI
Jayanti Gogoi – Appellant
Versus
Pranati Duara – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: K.K. Mahanta, Adv.
For Respondents/Defendant: T.J. Phukan, Adv.

JUDGMENT

I.A. Ansari, J.

1. This appeal has arisen out of judgment and decree, dated 17.9.1994, passed by the learned District Judge, Nagaon, in Title Suit No. 04 of 1992, whereby the plaintiff's suit was dismissed on contest with costs.

2. In a nutshell, the case of the plaintiff appellants reads as follows :

On 18.2.1931, Ambikeswar Phukan, a mauzadar, executed a will (Ext. 2) bequeathing his properties mentioned in the will to Smt. Labanya Prava Gogol, who was also named as executor of the will. The testator, namely, Ambikeswar Phukan died as far back as on 22.10.1933. The executor, namely, Smt. Labanya Prava Gogoi filed an application seeking probate of the will as late as on 30.7.73, i.e., after 40 years of the death of the testator. This application was, in course of time, registered as Misc. (Probate) Case No. 10/1973. This application was renumbered as T.S. 10/73 and the same was contested by the respondents. During pendency of the said suit, the executor aforementioned died. The suit, was accordingly dismissed by order, dated 25.7.1978. Long 13 years thereafter, the predecessor-in-interest of the present appellants, namely, Suresh Gogoi, who was the only heir of deceased Smt.



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top