SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Gau) 61

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Iqbal Ahmed Ansari, J.
Prasanta Kr. Modi and Ors. - Appellants
Vs.
State of Assam and Ors. - Respondent
WP(C) No. 7393 of 2002
Decided On: 11.02.2003

Advocates appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: A.S. Choudhury, R. Mazumdar, A. Maleque, I. Hussain and R. Ahmed, Advs.
For Respondents/Defendant: M. Bhagawati, Adv.

Appointments made in compliance with preferential appointment rules cannot be kept in abeyance without proper eligibility enquiries.

Headnote:

Preferential Appointment - Assam Movement - Assam Public Services (Preferential Appointment) Rules, 1999 - Rule 2(a)

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, next of kin of those who sacrificed their lives or were disabled in the Assam movement, sought writs to set aside orders keeping their appointments in abeyance. The respondent contested citing complaints about eligibility.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the appointments were made in accordance with government decisions and received clearance. The impugned orders were set aside, allowing for eligibility enquiries.

Issues: Validity of keeping appointments in abeyance, compliance with Preferential Appointment Rules, 1999, and the authority to conduct eligibility enquiries.

Ratio Decidendi: Appointments made in accordance with government decisions and rules cannot be kept in abeyance without proper enquiry into eligibility.

Final Decision: The impugned orders were set aside, and the respondents were allowed to conduct eligibility enquiries. The petitioners were directed to cooperate, and to be paid their due salaries and allowances.

JUDGMENT

I.A. Ansari, J.

1. By making this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners, who describe themselves as next of kin of persons, who had sacrificed their lives or who had been rendered physically disabled permanently, while participating in the Assam movement on the problem of foreigners, have approached this Court seeking issuance of appropriate Writs setting aside and quashing the order, dated 1.10.2002 (Annexure-7 to the writ petition) and order dated 4.10.2002 (Annexure-8 in the writ petition) issued by the Respondent No. 4, namely, Director of Higher Secondary Education, Assam, whereby the appointments of the petitioners as teaching and non-teaching staff of schools have been kept in abeyance.

2. In a narrow campus, the case of the petitioners may be put as follows :-

The Government of Assam decided to make appointment, in public services under the Government of Assam, of the next of kins of those who had sacrificed their lives as well as those, who had been victims of the Assam Movement, on the problem of foreigners, by relaxing the provisions of the relevant Recruitment Rules of the services concerned in terms of the provisions of the Assam Public Services (Preferential Appointment) Rules, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as "the said Rules of 1999"). In accordance with the decision taken by the Government on 6.7.2002, appointments were to be made in the Departments of Flood Control, Public Works, Irrigation, Public Health, Engineering, Social Welfare, Panchayat and Rural Development Health & Family Welfare, Home, Education and Excise. As per this decision, the Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Personnel (B) Department vide his letter dated 11.2.2000, informed the departments concerned about the said decision of the Government with a request to make appointments in terms of the said decision within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of the list of candidates to be furnished by the Implementation of the Assam Accord Department (popularly known as (IAA Department) and clarified to the departments concerned that the clearance of the State Level Empowered Committee for recruitment against the posts aforementioned had also been accorded. It was further conveyed vide the letter, dated 11.07.2000, aforementioned that the "affected candidates" shall be appointed against the vacancies shown, by the concerned administrative department in the letter under reference. The petitioners fall within the ambit of the definition of the "affected candidates" and they were duly issued certificates by the Deputy Commissioners concerned certifying the same. All the petitioners, except petitioner No. 4, are graduates and, therefore, entitled to be appointed as Assistant Teachers of Secondary Schools. The petitioner No. 4 has passed H.S.S.L.C. examination and he is entitled to be appointed as LDA-cum-Typist/Section Assistant inasmuch as he has passed proficiency test in typing. After necessary verification, the IAA Department prepared a list of 29 candidates including the petitioners for appointment. After necessary verification, 18 candidates including the petitioners, except petitioner No. 4, were appointed as school teachers and the petitioner No. 4 was appointed as LDA-cum-Typist by Respondent No. 4 aforementioned vide order dated 24.2.2002. By their order of appointment, the petitioners were directed to join the respective posts within 15 days from the date of receipt of the order. The petitioner Nos. 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 have already joined their respective posts, but the petitioner Nos. 1, 2 and 4 have not been allowed to join their respective posts by the concerned Headmasters on the ground that by the impugned order dated 1.10.2002 and 4.10.2002, aforementioned, the appointments were asked to be kept in abeyance. For the direction so given, no reason has been assigned by the respondent concerned. While persons, similarly appointed, have already been receiving salaries and allowances regularly,













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top