LODGE, THADANI
Chandra Nath Sarma – Appellant
Versus
Guna Bam Kalita – Respondent
[2] The suit was instituted by one Gunaram Kalita in the following circumstances. It appears that the plaintiff bad taken 'a settlement of a plot of land and a patta No. 4 / 6 on an annual lease for the year 1939-40. He applied to the revenue authorities for a periodic settlement. The appellants also applied for a similar settlement. The Sub-Deputy Collector of Kamalpun Circle decided to settle the land on the parties in equal shares and passed an order to that effect on 6th September 1940. The plaintiff appealed against this order to the revenue authorities but his appeal was rejected. The plaintiff then instituted the present suit for a declaration that he alone was entitled to get a settlement of the whole plot and impleaded the appellants only,
[3] It is not necessary to refer to the written statement of the appellants as we take the view that the plaintiff's suit was wholly misconceived from the point of view of the party sued,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.