RAM LABHAYA
Nripendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Naumoni Das – Respondent
Some 8 lessas of land belonging to the petitioner and his co-judgment-debtors (opposite parties 3 and 4) were mortgaged to one Surendra Narayan Burabhakat. The mortgagee obtained a decree for sale on the basis of his mortgage. After this decree, opposite parties 3 and 4 (co-judgment-debtors) sold their 2/3rd share of the land in dispute to Opposite Party 2. In the course of the execution proceeding, he put in a claim by which ,he prayed for the release of the 2/3rd share of the mortgaged property sold to him by two out of the three judgment-debtors. The petitioner states that he did not receive any notice of this claim petition. On 24-6-1950, the 2/3rd share, sold to Opposite Party 2, was released. The decree-holder agreed to proceed against the l/3rd share belonging to the petitioner. On 27-2-1951, the petitioner-judgment-debtor put in a petition of objection urging that the decree-holder is not entitled
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.