SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Gau) 61

RAM LABHAYA
Abdul Aziz Chaudhury – Appellant
Versus
Barindra Kumar Das – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.P.Bhattacharjee, S.K.Ghose , G.K.Deb, D.K.Sharma

This appeal arises out of a tills suit. Plaintiff prayed for declaration of title to and confirmation of possession or in the alter­native for delivery of Khas possession in case he was found out of possession. The property con­sists of Jote rights in land with some structures on it Plaintiff's claim is confined to one-sixth share in the Jote right and one-sixth share of maliki rights in the house and the latrine on the suit land.

(2) Mofazzor All and Asaddar All were the ori­ginal owners of this land with the structures on it and they were in possession through Madhab. After Madhab's death his son Raghu succeeded. Plaintiff's case is that on 16th, June 1956 Rakesh, defendant No. 7 and defendants Nos. 8 to 11 got settlement of the suit land from the landlords and purchased the structures on it. The settlement was obtained in the name of defendant 7 who was the Karta It was in favour of all the members of the joint family. Rakesh, defendant 7, later brought an ejectment (T, S. No. 62/47) against Raghu.

The suit was compromised and Raghu vacated the land. On 26th June, 1948 defendants Nos 2 to 6 got a registered Kataala executed in their fa­vour by defendant No. 7. He purported to conv























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top