SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Gau) 66

SARJOO PROSAD, G.MEHROTRA
Balbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.C.Pathak, R.K.Goswami

G. MEHROTRA, J.:

This is a revision against the decision of the Ses­sions Judge, Upper Assam Districts, who confirmed the conviction and sentences passed against the two applicants-Balbir Sing and Inderjit Sing by Sri A. Ahmed, Magistrate, 1st Class at Jorhat. Applicant No. 1 was convicted under S. 61-A of the East Bengal and Assam Excise Act-hereinafter called the Act- and applicant No. 2 was convicted under S. 53 (1) (a) of the Act. Each of these two applicants were sen­tenced to six months' rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- in default to undergo another period of three months' rigorous imprisonment.

(2) The prosecution case is that on 21-11-54 the Excise Inspector under the authority of a search war­rant searched the Broadway Hotel and restaurant in­cluding .its kitchen and recovered one bottle of Hey-ward's brandy, one kettle containing liquor, one bottle containing about a dram of Heyward's brandy, one bottle containing traces of Heyward's whisky, six empty bottles of Heyward's whisky, rum, brandy, one tumbler with smell of liquor, from the kitchen and from the drawer of the Manager's secretariat table, one bottle containing about 2 1/2 ounces of Hey­ward's wh



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top