C.JAGANNADHACHARYULU
Rajendra Mohan Sinha – Appellant
Versus
Nimai Chand Sinha – Respondent
2. The facts of the case involving a long drawn out litigation which led to the institution of this second appeal are as follows:-
(a) There is a Taluk No. 36, situate in mouja Kamrangabari under Pargana Bhi-tar Kailasahar, about 16 drones in extent, which stood in the names of Ramananda Singh, Sri Krishna Deb and Nabin Chandra Deb. 36/4 is a Kharija Taluk out of the same being 1 drone, 9 kanis, 13 gandas and 3 karas in extent.
(b) Khariia Taluk No. 36/4 belonged to Kuttasa Fakir. He possessed the same through his tenants namely, the defendants 1, 2, the father of the defendants 13 and 14 and the father of the third defendant. They executed Ext. 4, Kabuli-yat dated 10th of Bhadra, 1353 T. E. in his favour. Under Ext. A dated 30th Bh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.