SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Gau) 49

C.S.NAYUDU, P.K.GOSWAMI
Sohanraj Singvi – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Taxes, Assam, Shillong – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.P.Bhattacharjee, B.C.Barua

GOSWAMI, J.:-

This case comes to this Court on a reference under Section 32 (4) of the Assam Sales Tax Act, 1947, hereinafter called the Act. The petitioner-assessee was assessed to sales tax by the Superintendent of Taxes by his order dated 5-4-1962 after due notice to him as required under the law. It so happened that on 9-1-1962 two Inspectors of Taxes made a surprise visit to his shop and tried to take possession of the credit account books, apparently perhaps there was some in­formation that his account books were not kept in 3 proper order. The petitioner was absent at the time and when he returned made a row with the officers concerned challenging their authority, and it is said that the books of ac­count were taken away from the possession of the officers and later on concealed and not made available to the department when they asked for the books to be produced. The Super­intendent of Taxes after having rejected the statements of account, which were produced before him, gave a notice to the petitioner on 3-3-1962 mentioning about the visit of the Inspectors to his shop for the purpose of seiz­ing the accounts, and also asked him to show cause against various allegations and

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top