SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Gau) 50

BAHARUL ISLAM
Prabhat Chandra Saikia – Appellant
Versus
Rajani Bala Devi and others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K. Sen and D.R. Guha, B.K. Goswami

Judgement

ORDER:- This application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure by the defendant is directed against the order dated 14-9-1970 passed by the Sadar Munsiff, Gauhati in Title Suit No.41 of 1961, allowing the plaintiff to withdraw the suit. The material facts, necessary for the purpose of disposal of this application, briefly are that the plaintiffs brought the suit against the defendant for eviction and recovery of khas possession of the suit land. During the pendency of the suit, plaintiff No.1 died and some of his heirs were not brought on record in time. When the surviving plaintiffs made an application for substitution of the heirs of the deceased plaintiff, the defendant filed an objection alleging that the suit had abated. The plaintiffs then made a prayer before the Court for permission to withdraw the suit with permission to file a fresh suit and the learned Munsiff allowed the plaintiffs to withdraw the suit on payment of Rs.20/- as costs to the defendant with the permission to bring a fresh suit holding that the defect for which the plaintiffs sought to withdraw the suit was "a formal defect".

2. The defendant-petitioner challenges the order of the learned










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top