SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Gau) 81

M.C.PATHAK, BAHARUL ISLAM
Satish Chandra Brahma – Appellant
Versus
Bagram Brahma and another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.P. Sen

Judgement

PATHAK, J. :- This appeal is from the judgment and decree passed by the learned Assistant District Judge, Dhubri.

2. The plaintiffs case is that the land described in the schedule to the plaint originally belonged to Bijendra Nath Brahma, who had been enjoying the said land. After his death the suit land was inherited by his widow Rauswari Brahmani, pro forma defendant No. 2, and his son Pagla Brahma. Pagla Brahma died leaving his mother defendant No. 2 as the sole heir of the suit land. After coming into force of the Hindu Succession Act on 17th June, 1956, the defendant No. 2 became the absolute owner of the suit property. Defendant No. 2 continued to live with plaintiff Satish Chandra Brahma alias Satindra Brahma, who cultivated the suit land as an "Adhiar". On 5-2-1962 the defendant No. 2 made a gift of the suit land to the plaintiff and executed a registered deed of gift and since then the plaintiff had been possessing and cultivating the suit land by virtue of his own right. Thereafter at the instance of the defendant No. 1 a proceeding under Sec. 145. Criminal P. C. was started and the suit land was attached in that proceeding. The Criminal Court in the proceeding un







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top