SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Gau) 27

P.K.GOSWAMI, B.N.SARMA
Fulbarunessa – Appellant
Versus
Assam Board of Revenue, Gauhati and another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.M. Lahiri, Advocate General, Meghalaya and B.M. Mahanta, Sulalmon and A. Rahman

Judgement

SARMA, J. :- This application under Article 226 of the Constitution is directed against the judgement and order of the Assam Board of Revenue dated 7-12-1970 passed in Case No. 332 RA/68, by which it set aside the order of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Barpeta dated 13-8-1968 passed in R. A. No. 293/65-66, as well as that of the Assistant Settlement Officer, Baghbor Circle dated 29-11-1961 passed in Dispute Case No. 2, which was affirmed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Barpeta in the said appeal.

2. The Dispute Case No. 2 was initiated by the Assistant Settlement Officer, Baghbor Circle, during the last settlement operation on an application filed by the petitioner Mt. Fulbarunessa claiming mutation of her name in respect of 8 bighas and odd land in two dags, namely dag Nos. 213 and 233 of an annual patta of village Gobindapur, Mouzh Jabia, standing in the name of respondent No. 2 Pandit Ali. It was alleged by the petitioner in that petition that her mother Sarifunnessa along with her (Sarifunnessas) mother Mt. Jurfannessa and brother Pandit Ali jointly purchased the entire land of the patta from the original pattadar Isu Dewani under a registered sale deed dated 21-12-1934















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top