SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Gau) 37

D.M.SEN, BAHARUL ISLAM
Khetekeswari Debya – Appellant
Versus
Atul Chandra Barua and others – Respondent


P. Choudhuri and T.N. Phukan, for Plaintiff-Appellant; S.K. Ghose, J.P. Bhattacharjee and S.N. Medhi, for Defendants-Respondents.

Judgement

BAHARUL ISLAM, J. :- This appeal is by the plaintiff and is directed against the judgement and decree passed by the Subordinate Judge, Upper Assam Districts at Jorhat in Title Suit No. 32 of 1959. The plaintiffs suit was for declaration of her right, title and interest in the suit land and for khas possession and mesne profits.

2. The case of the plaintiff is that the suit land measuring 81 B. 7 Lechas was the self-acquired property of her father Manuram, Manuram had a brother named Bhabadeb. They had been separated, Manuram came to the suit land situated in village Kaibartaeaon, while Bhabadeb continued to live in the paternal village Kenduguri, Manuram had his wife. Chandra Prova, and two daughters-Golapi and the plaintiff. Manuram went on pilgrimage and died there. Thereafter Manurams widow, Chandra Prova, and daughter, Golapi also died. Thus the plaintiff became the only heiress of Manuram. At the time of Manurams death the plaintiff was a child of about 4/5 years. So Bhabadeb came to the suit land from Kenduguri and d to look after the plaint









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top